Search for: "People v. Rojas" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 11:05 am
Rojas again on this count were it to so choose.We'll see if it does. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:13 pm
  To me, every reasonable juror would be required to so conclude as a matter of law.If only because -- and hopefully this doesn't shock anyone -- people at work sometimes make personal calls from their phone.Crazy, I know.Which in turn means that if you record every single call, you know that you're definitely going to be recording these as well. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
Rojas the Eleventh Circuit kicked a marriage fraud conviction on statute of limitations grounds. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm by David Oscar Markus
Lots of people (91 in total and 45 in Miami!) [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Much ink has already been spilled about the Medellín v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Apotex Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company et al., 2015 ONSC 5396 -> Damage lawsuits could be latest antitrust challenge for Google in Europe -> Uber Rebuffed by Judge in Ruling on Drivers’ Suit -> Google Antitrust Investigations Spread Across the Globe – -> Google’s Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers –… [read post]