Search for: "People v. Ross" Results 401 - 420 of 607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
(Ross Ramsey at the Texas Tribune walks through all this in more detail, for those interested.)What does this mean for policing and corrections? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by Christopher Spizzirri
  In reading Cecil Lynn's excellent recent article on Law.com, Drama & Destruction, that provides a great rundown of 2010 case law, I came across this case summary: In Ross v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
The last one-time relist to get a grant was Ross v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Christina Sonsire
(Ross v Louise Wise Serv., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 489, quoting Walker v Sheldon, 10 NY2d 401, 405; see Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479; Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332, 335). [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Decision of the Complaints Committee – 28831-20 Ross v thejc.com 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am by New Books Script
K 1066 B83 2011 From crisis to crisis : the global financial system and regulatory failure Ross P. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
1 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In any constitutional law class there, he would have read Marshall’s Marbury v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:37 am by Stephen Griffin
  People begin to feel nervous about what should be standard government operations. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am by Ben
Edinburgh's Court of Session found that the screening of a match between Celtic and Ross County was infringing and the Bar owners were also in contempt of court after breaching an interim interdict order against screening Sky's programmes (here a Scotland v Belgium international football match just hours after after the order was made) without a commercial agreement in place. [read post]