Search for: "People v. Ross"
Results 441 - 460
of 693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 6:58 am
Edinburgh's Court of Session found that the screening of a match between Celtic and Ross County was infringing and the Bar owners were also in contempt of court after breaching an interim interdict order against screening Sky's programmes (here a Scotland v Belgium international football match just hours after after the order was made) without a commercial agreement in place. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am
Edinburgh's Court of Session found that the screening of a match between Celtic and Ross County was infringing and the Bar owners were also in contempt of court after breaching an interim interdict order against screening Sky's programmes (here a Scotland v Belgium international football match just hours after after the order was made) without a commercial agreement in place. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Music service in copyright fightSocial media and disclosure in litigation: Garacci v Ross Contract requiring ex-employee to compensate former employer for competing ruled enforceable in BCNew Toronto police ‘carding’ policy could help repair relations with minority youth Should Law Professors Have a Continuing Practice Experience (CPE) Requirement? [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:18 pm
Ross P. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
Ross Construction Co. (1940). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
The issue up for debate was based on Ross River Dena v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:33 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:06 pm
[Chuck Ross, The Federalist] Kansas school-finance suit tests whether litigators can end-run elected officials on taxes and spending [WSJ, compare Colorado] Lenore Skenazy (who’ll speak at Cato Mar. 6) on the Wellesley “Sleepwalker” sculpture flap: “Once we equate making people feel bad with actually attacking them, free expression is basically obsolete” [WSJ] “School Found Liable After Child Sneaks Onto Roof And Falls” [Erik… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:40 am
” [10] See U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
In its badly misguided decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
Like the rapper Rick Ross, fans use pseudonyms as part of a creative purpose. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
at 536.]Apropos here, "[c]ross motions for summary judgment do not preclude the existence of issues of fact." [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Ross v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:10 pm
So much so that even people like me have heard of him.But what I didn't know -- until now -- is that "Rick Ross" isn't actually Rick Ross. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
” And when threats of draconian sentences compel guilty pleas, “some innocent people will plead guilty. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
Static Control didn’t have antitrust standing federally, per 6th Cir.Rebecca Tushnet - Georgetown University Law Center, representing amicus curiae, Law ProfessorsWhy should people who are primarily interested in TM care? [read post]
