Search for: "People v. Salaam" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2007, 2:15 am
WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Expert Testimony of Psychological Phenomena Affecting Identification Testimony Admitted, Denied People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court concludes that the signed and sworn supporting affidavit of the burglary victim constituted reliable hearsay and/or a relevant statement of any victim under Correction Law § 168-n [3], and that the court was entitled to consider and rely on such evidence as clear and convincing proof that defendant is a level three risk as ruled in People v Saleemi, People v Victor, People v Jimenez and People v Salaam. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:39 pm by Wendy McGuire Coats
Holder, 598 F.3d 647, 655 (9th Cir. 2010) (mandate pending) (explaining that where the IJ fails to make an explicit credibility finding, he cannot require corroborating evidence); Salaam v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:11 am by Eric Turkewitz
Judge Abdus-Salaam thought it necessary, in concurring, to discuss at length the two cases before the court (the other, Dubinsky v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by Michael Scutt
 This is yet another illustration of how some people seem to take leave of their senses when using social media. [read post]