Search for: "People v. Salazar" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm by Adam Schlossman
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, the employee’s retaliation claim alleging that the acting director told her peers “if you think you’re going to file some kind of EEO complaint and then be considered a team player, it’s much harder to be a team player on the outside than it is on the inside,” also survived summary judgment (Rose v Salazar, December 18, 2013, Daniel, W). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Gividen for compiling the cases in this post. ============================================================ Returning Relists Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:37 am by SHG
Much as the First Circuit held in Glik v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Salazar, No. 07-40683 Conviction and sentence for witness tampering are affirmed where: 1) conviction was based on sufficient evidence; 2) an objection to the application of a cross-reference to a sentencing guideline was waived; 3) the penalty provisions of the witness-tampering statute were correctly applied; and 4) the proper burden of proof was applied in determining sentence enhancements. . [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Vice President Joe Biden: "More people are going to be put to work this summer. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEASee issue description at Public CitizenØ SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here3rd CircuitØ Donlin v. [read post]