Search for: "People v. Sally (1993)"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 10:49 am
Ramada Inc., 826 F.Supp. 726 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (finding that ads featuring actual people Frank and Cindy Marriott and Donald and Sally Hyatt, and stating "Why the Marriotts [Hyatts] Stay at Renaissance," didn't violate the Lanham Act). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) Kubert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Reg. 51,735 (Oct. 4, 1993) (emphasis added). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]