Search for: "People v. Sanders" Results 101 - 120 of 355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Sanders—the Court further cemented the “one person, one vote” doctrine. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 Though perhaps a Sanders presidency would foment a genuine revolution when his gullible admirers come to realize that not even Bernie can turn the sow's ear that is our constitutional system into a silk purse.Needless to say, I don't expect anything to come of such criticisms, not only because we inexplicably venerate a truly flawed Constitution, but also because Article V, coupled with our general distrust of popular democracy, makes the idea of a constitutional… [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded that the bill “confiscates every American’s private health insurance” and that “America will never be a socialist country. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Lincoln spoke of government "of, by, and for the people. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
There are too many possible stories about how you are the people, and the other people are usurpers or mobs. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Sanders, “holding the Constitution’s command that the House of Representatives be elected ‘by the People’ requires that congressional districts be equal in population” New York Times v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
(Even Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House Press Secretary, admitted to the Special Counsel's team of lawyers that she had been publicly untruthful.) [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And Sanders is called a radical, merely because he calls himself a democratic socialist? [read post]