Search for: "People v. Satchell" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now that people have died, we'll see litigation surrounding this. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:38 am by John Floyd
    This exception was evidenced by a May 10, 2023 decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
They “dispose of public rights held by the government on behalf of the people. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
In Mississippi, a concealed carry permit is no longer necessary to carry a firearm enclosed in a purse, briefcase, or satchel. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm by Shea Denning
Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361, 1370 (Cal. 1971) overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Ilya Shapiro at Cato: In its ruling today in Riley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
When people see the red sole on the street they think Louboutin. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:57 pm
Manning noticed the old dates on them, and portraits of "old-fashioned people," so she did some internet investigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
  Other people just can't do it. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:58 pm
Case in point, courtesy of Eugene Volokh: a Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]