Search for: "People v. Schafer" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 6:19 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" The failure of the court to apprehend the extent of its discretion deprived defendant of the right to be sentenced as provided by law' " (People v Schafer, 19 AD3d 1133). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
The subsequent amendments (Bill C-2) increased penalties (including mandatory minimum); Smyth argues that materials are circulating while the public desire for ‘justice’ has been satisfied by prosecutions of people like Sharpe, giving examples of R v Chin [2005] AJ No 1712, R v Austin [2006] BCK No 3430 and (missed the last one), and suggesting model legislation that would be more appropriate based on the harm, referring to images that reasonable person… [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Many people think that the Court should adopt 2 or 3 but not 1, because 1 is in some senses the most “broad. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Astrue, everybody’s favorite Commissioner of Social Security, is back this week in Schafer v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:32 pm by Chip Merlin
Several Indiana cases after Reibly also apply this exception, including one just nine months after Reibly, see Schafer v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Schafer, Matthew and Valsangikar, Tanvi, The Application of the New York Anti-SLAPP Scheme in Federal Court (2023). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The article is in response to the French data protection regulator CNIL’s recent decision to stop collecting and processing people’s data in France. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:15 pm by robert_richards
For example, Professor Adam Benforado’s new paper explores how spatial situations affect the law-related behavior and thinking of various participants in criminal cases, while another of his recent articles argues that the context of the videotape evidence at issue in Scott v. [read post]