Search for: "People v. Schmidt"
Results 101 - 120
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
“These are people who are a bit older and they needed an answer quickly because [it could affect their estates]. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
Yesterday evening (so late that I was too tired to blog about it immediately, but I did tweet about it), President (Chief Judge) Beate Schmidt of the Bundespatentgericht (BPatG, Federal Patent Court of Germany) declared the patent invalid in the form in which the European Patent Office had inexplicably and unjustifiably granted it.The court also tossed ten different amended versions of the patent (amendments 1-9 and 9A) that Google (Motorola) submitted and Apple and Microsoft opposed. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:32 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
By Eric Goldman Lindsay P. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Patent No. 7,479,949 on a "touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics", which has been referred to by many people, including Apple's own lawyers, as "the Steve Jobs patent". [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:46 am
By Eric Goldman People mocked Google CEO Eric Schmidt for his 2010 suggestion that teenagers should change their names when they turn 18 to avoid the indiscreet and ill-advised Internet posts they made as youths. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
”4 The requirement of a signed writing “is not only designed to protect people against false claims of oral agreements,” but it also serves “to make the ownership of property rights in intellectual property clear and definite, so that such property will be readily marketable. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm
(“Dick”) Schmidt, was General Counsel for the United States Information Agency (USIA). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The resulting lawsuit, Baumann v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The resulting lawsuit, Baumann v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Try to sort through Tolmosova v Umarova 2012 NY Slip Op 51921(U) Decided on October 1, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Schmidt, J. and you will see two things. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Given that people often use the term “noncompete” to mean nonsolicitation agreements as well, as are those included? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Schmidt v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
The plaintiffs in the Brown litigation are represented by Schmidt of the Edwin F. [read post]
