Search for: "People v. Score"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York heard the case of the People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
The DSM-V website is live as of today. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
The epic battle that could have been Lindsay Lohan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
In the wake of this Delaware Senate resolution, here’s comes news from this WSJ blog: Score this round for the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:26 am
After scores of written briefs by the three parties, the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am
Remember credit scoring? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
The ruling in Coleman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Highlights this week included: Google scores an own goal: Google-funded Intellectual Ventures sues Motorola Mobility (FOSS Patents) (IAM) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:10 am
In discussing the Static 99, for example, and indicating that PH had scored a seven indicating that he was at high risk to commit a criminal sex offense, it was not clear to the court whether this meant that PH was at high risk to commit additional acts of exhibitionism or that PH was at a high risk to commit a sex offense as defined under article 10. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:43 am
[Ricci v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
View the article here | View the Judge's Decision HereCongratulations to AFPD Ed Weiss who scored a dismissal of a failure to register prosecution brought under SORNA in the S.D. of W.Va! [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
That's not enough.The goofiness of grading curves surfaced recently in Marquis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
People v. [read post]
