Search for: "People v. Score"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 11:53 am
If you’re keeping score, 1-800 Contacts won 5 Polaroid factors (one only slightly) and 1 factor was irrelevant; while the defendant prevailed on 2 factors. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
It was created, in part, to fundamentally steer the culture and practices of people in virtually every aspect of their lives. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
In Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:45 am
Morgan * Buying Keyword Ads on People’s Names Doesn’t Violate Their Publicity Rights–Habush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York heard the case of the People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
The DSM-V website is live as of today. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
In the wake of this Delaware Senate resolution, here’s comes news from this WSJ blog: Score this round for the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
The epic battle that could have been Lindsay Lohan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:26 am
After scores of written briefs by the three parties, the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am
Remember credit scoring? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
The ruling in Coleman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Highlights this week included: Google scores an own goal: Google-funded Intellectual Ventures sues Motorola Mobility (FOSS Patents) (IAM) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:10 am
In discussing the Static 99, for example, and indicating that PH had scored a seven indicating that he was at high risk to commit a criminal sex offense, it was not clear to the court whether this meant that PH was at high risk to commit additional acts of exhibitionism or that PH was at a high risk to commit a sex offense as defined under article 10. [read post]
