Search for: "People v. Scott" Results 41 - 60 of 2,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
In 2013, O’Connor told the Harvard Business Review that her experience as a legislator taught her to “work with people because you want to have as many on board for your position as you can. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm by Ilya Somin
Township of Scott(2019), the the Supreme Court reversed Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Professor Scott Dodson has documented, Congress has allowed the Court wide leeway in promulgating the Rules of the Supreme Court. [read post]