Search for: "People v. Scott" Results 101 - 120 of 2,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 7:03 am by David Post
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) Just FYI, in yesterday’s Cato Daily Podcast I talk with Caleb Brown about the upcoming Nelson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
In contrast, Lord Scott, Neuberger and Brown argued that D2 should have been liable: if the aim was to punish the victim then the method was of less relevance than the purpose. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am by Steve Lubet
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Ferguson, which held that segregation did not imply Black people's inferiority, and instead only mentioned its ideas in discussing Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Donna Eng
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:21 am
For example, in his account of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]