Search for: "People v. Secret" Results 1 - 20 of 3,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2012, 8:19 pm by Chris Neumeyer
If disclosure of the information may be restricted to just a few people, who will first sign confidentiality agreements, and otherwise it will be protected by strict security measures, trade secret protection may work. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
Question: when is a secret not a secret? [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm by Cindy Cohn
It avoids the Kafkaesque situations in which people, like Joseph K in The Trial and the thousands of people on the secret No Fly Lists, cannot figure out what they did that resulted in government scrutiny, much less clear their names. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:03 am by Adam Wagner
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play 9/11 ten years on Even more secret evidence for government in Al Rawi case Mutual confidentiality between intelligence services trumped by open justice requirements [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 6:04 am by Brian Wm. Higgins
The reasons are simple: most trade secret cases involve people—usually current or former employees—who were entrusted with a company’s most valuable confidential information, and who breached that trust for personal gain. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:17 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
African Transformation Movement v The Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2021] ZASCA 164 (2 December 2021)     [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
   The two Secret Service agents who appealed a case to try to stop a lawsuit against them did not need the Court to go that far in order for them to win, and it was not apparent that most of the Justices thought they had to do so to reach a decision in the specific case of Reichle, et al., v. [read post]