Search for: "People v. Shah"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:19 am
In Shah v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:05 pm
Gamboa, Just Transition on the Margins of Labour Law: Integrating Legal Adaptive Capacity and Philippine Administrative Legal Framework Mohamad Nasir, Coal Mining Operations and Environmental Rights Violations in the East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia Part 3: Human Rights Protection of Vulnerable Persons Saumya Uma, Marital Rape in South Asia: Colonial Origins and Postcolonial Challenges Nadhratul Wardah Salman, Saroja Dhanapal & Shad Saleem Faruqi, Illegitimate Children Plight… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Barr v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
” Meshell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 7:32 pm
That is up from 13.1 million people this year. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:19 am
Sources: Forbes.com, "Judge Rules Against Bank In Mortgage Modification Suit," Shah Gilani, 2/10/2011 Aceves v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:57 am
The division bench comprising of Justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna asked the state to make necessary amendments to the Explanation to Section 10 (26AAA) of the act. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:11 pm
Shah Alam & Abdullah Al Faruque, The Problem of Delimitation of Bangladesh's Maritime Boundaries with India and Myanmar: Prospects for a SolutionJinyuan Su & Yiwei Lu, People's Republic of China: The Law of the People's Republic of China on Island Protection 2009Douglas Guilfoyle, European Court of Human Rights: Mevedyev and Others v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:04 am
Tarik Ibn Osman Shah et al. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
In Haidak v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:32 pm
(iii) C.B.F.C. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
Shah Ninth Circuit Upholds Web Host's Liability for Counterfeiting Retailers--Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
Paras Shah analyzed a U.N. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:02 am
From People v. [read post]
