Search for: "People v. Sharp (1994)" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Rarely do people become so exasperated with each other that they sense no way out but physical conflict. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Anthony Graves was convicted in 1994 for killing six people in 1992. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  Quashing multiple defamation proceedings initiated against media the judge said public servants and constitutional functionaries must be able to face criticism since they owed a solemn duty to the people. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am by Kali Borkoski
All of these decisions were sharply divided and warrant sharp criticism. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
  Way back in May, 1994, in San Jose, Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Under the old Code, there was a sharp difference of opinion amongst the various High Courts on the question as to whether the courts had an inherent power to pass an order of bail in anticipation of arrest, the preponderance of view being that it did not have such power. [read post]