Search for: "People v. Sheets" Results 41 - 60 of 883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 11:37 am by Michael W. Huseman
While the rule changes require official citation to the public-domain numbering and paragraph scheme, they continue to allow parallel citations to the unofficial regional reporters such as the North East Reporter and Illinois Decisions.An example of a Supreme Court citation under the new system would look like this: People v Doe, 2011 IL 102345, ¶15.This shows the name of the case, 2011 as the year of decision, the Illinois Supreme Court as the court of decision, 102345 as the… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
  Anecdotally some people in the industry seem to have perceived a decrease in filings, at least against their companies. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:10 am
Ed. 2d 302), inasmuch as Room 210 was secured while officers waited for the crime scene unit, which arrived within several hours and then seized the ripped currency, ripped sheet, and blood evidence that was in plain view (see People v George, supra; see also People v Brown, 96 N.Y.2d 80, 89, 749 N.E.2d 170, 725 N.Y.S.2d 601). [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
(His sheets appear to have a spectacular thread-count.) [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the event Defendant should wish to seek reclassification or to be relieved of any further duty to register under Correction Law § 168-o there apparently exists no record to permit adequate judicial review as held in People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  People v Wlasiuk ; 2011 NY Slip Op 09544 ; Decided on December 29, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Third Department  reads like one. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
The full text of the proclamation can be found below, as well as a fact sheet and a list of frequently-asked questions that the White House released. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Icons and file menus are generally not considered to be protectable under copyright law following the 1994 ruling in Apple Computer v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm by Jodie Liu
In a similar vein, petitioner underscores that under Justice Jackson’s framework in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]