Search for: "People v. Simmons" Results 1 - 20 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 11:35 am
Simmons (2005), the US Supreme Court decided that people could not be put to death for crimes that they commit before they turn age 18. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
  In fact, Hasan Simmons has first-hand experience of this scenario, and the loss of one of his jurors because her child was ill is one of the issues in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
In Simmons, the defendant was convicted of attempted rape in the first degree and two counts of murder in the first degree and was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:34 pm by cdw
The next will address system issues in the representation of poor people through the lens of two cases,  Simmons v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing “a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime” (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Simmons (2005), and those who rape as child (or perhaps commit any non-homicide offense) in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Although the People demonstrated due diligence in attempting to locate the victim for trial (see People v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 571, cert denied 456 US 979), the court unduly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim at the preliminary hearing, and thus the admission in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130-131). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
 Katfriend and Simmons & Simmons trainee Ayomide Sanwo has prepared a report on the day. [read post]