Search for: "People v. Simmons"
Results 1 - 20
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2025, 3:46 pm
Getty v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 2:56 am
The good and the great from the trade mark world, at least insofar as it includes people who were in London on 3 April, descended on the offices of Simmons & Simmons for this year’s excellent Retromark, in association with the IPKat. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents the fifteenth volume in his rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 8:06 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 4:26 pm
Miranda and Simmons were bad people. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:40 am
Emanuela discussed very hot topics, including the cases Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The case, Whittington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:33 pm
From Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
In these cases—Elrod v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
This proportion was significantly higher than results from a survey of healthy people, in which 24% reported eating frozen berries in the week before they were interviewed. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:53 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:38 pm
The lawsuit, Randle v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Stadnyk v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
While that case is at the intersection of patent and antitrust law, Justice Smith also hears purely technical patent cases (see this article by law firm Simmons & Simmons).In addition to Oxford, he studied at the University of Munich. [read post]
