Search for: "People v. Simmons (1981)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
Lincoln, 80 A.D.2d 877, 436 N.Y.S.2d 782 (2nd Dept., 1981); People v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:54 pm
” In re Marriage of Hellwig (1981), 100 Ill. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
As the court stated in Simmons v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am
” People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Otis Elevator Co., 861 F.2d 655, 660-61 (11th Cir. 1988); Simmons v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Onwuteaka, for Appellant, Pro Se.Anderson McLay "Andy" Simmons, for Neda Zargari, Appellee.Joseph O. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
Simmons-Harris (2002). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
