Search for: "People v. Siu"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2007, 5:52 am
Furthermore, the case of Hyatt v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Jam v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:12 am
Further, the US has a vice-president who plagiarized in law school and SIU has a president who plagiarized in his Ph.D. thesis. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
I suppose the only people that can answer that for most of those questions would be a jury of our peers. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:55 am
To bring this issue around to Poshard and Wendler and SIU, contemplate words written by Peter Gregory on self-plagiarism:Maybe work is different for university people, but I think those words belong to his former employer. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 3:26 am
Encompass Insurance Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
In the recent case (Anderson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:55 am
Shi V. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:51 am
However, in the Madey v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:26 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:29 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
