Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 3,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am by Michael W. McConnell, Pamela S. Karlan
Jack Smith took the position that the President isn’t immune to anything, and the Trump people took the position that the president’s immune from everything. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm by Steven Calabresi
 All of the people on that list are Senate-confirmed officers of the United States who could be given the additional power of prosecuting a case outside of their own districts. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Attorney or Special Counsel is almost surely at most an "inferior officer," as the Supreme Court held with respect to the Independent Counsel in 1988 in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
Smith was serving as a prosecutor at the International Criminal Court in the Hague. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Eric W. Orts
Chief Justice Roberts recites the Special Counsel Jack Smith’s allegations but somehow fails to grasp their main meaning. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]