Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 3,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
  If Congress or the IRS wants to allow people to so easily avoid capital gains taxes, they're free to do so. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
The court found that the plain language of the statute required the AG to issue regulations before SORNA could be applied retroactively to people convicted of sex offenses before July 27, 2006. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:11 am
What makes this interesting is that the court had already held, in Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And their lack of choice, under Smith and Miller, would have had no effect on the Court’s holding. [read post]