Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 361 - 380 of 3,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive lays down the basic principle that EU Member States cannot impose a general obligation on internet intermediaries to monitor what people say online. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:32 am
" The Court explained thatthat there is clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances to warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Weatherley, 41 AD3d 1238; see also People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by INFORRM
  However he recognised that the issue has a transnational dimension and has important implications for many millions of people across the EU making use of the internet. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Reserve Banks “People” or “the Government”: Bozeman Financial LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Should I ever plead guilty to a charge? [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Because SORA does not define "conviction," the court in Matter of Smith found it appropriate to look to CPL 1.20 (13), which provides that conviction includes “the entry of a plea of guilty” to an accusatory instrument, does not recognize nolo contendere pleas as was also held in People v Daiboch. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:20 am by Karen Ainslie
In Smith v Kit Kat Group (Pty) Ltd. (2017) 38 ILJ 483 (LC), the employee attempted suicide which resulted in him being severely injured and disfigured. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
Smith, 2 Wn.2d 118, 98 P.2d 647 (1939) (individual charged with larceny could not be convicted of embezzlement). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
  It's authored by Judge Milan Smith and joined by Judges McKeown and Fletcher. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
The panel consists of Judges Kozinski, Fernandez and Randy Smith. [read post]