Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:01 pm
Tourchin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Including the votes of conservative judges like Pamela Rymer and Milan Smith. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm
Bradley Smith answering the question: "A past conviction is keeping me from finding work what can I do?" [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
It allows people to sue under the Equal Protection Clause when they get screwed by the government. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
From today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Smith (Federal Jurisdiction; Indian Country Land Status) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlUnited Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:11 am
It is somewhat paradoxical, then, that the recent Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:35 pm
Yonker brought in his own people and was hard on the people already in place. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Smith, F. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am
But the appeals courts in both cases followed Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States (1994) 512 US 594, 599, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 2435; People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
Smith, 860 S.E.2d 51 (2021) (unpublished) (citing this framework from Hobbs). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
Today's Ninth Circuit opinion may turn a lot of things into illegal gambling -- at least under Washington state law.Judge Smith's opinion holds that the computer application "Big Fish Casino" entails illegal gambling because you get an initial purchase of "chips" but then, if you run out of chips, have to buy more. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
MCL 777.31” The Court again considered the applications in People v Corrin and People v Miller, which were held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Smith, which was decided this past December. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:57 am
In last week’s case (Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can I be arrested without evidence against me? [read post]
