Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2009, 8:41 am
See also McCormick on Evidence, p. 52 at 127, n.6 (3d ed. 1984); People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
But of the various cases I have read on the subject of dueling, the language in Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Smith (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 266, 273, review granted September 14, 2016, S236112 [check cashing business is commercial establishment].)People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 12:20 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was denied recently in this case on 10/15/19: Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
The Texas case, DeLeon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm
People v Smith, 213 AD2d 1073, 1074 [1995]). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm
People v Smith, 213 AD2d 1073, 1074 [1995]). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
People can also send hand signals to witnesses in court as well. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Smith, and Ms. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
