Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 581 - 600 of 3,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
 Here's the only evidence that you have on that point:  The victim's legal name is "Pat Smith".It is "highly likely" that Pat's a woman? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:27 pm
  People do get into marriages for a number of different reasons. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
  That case, from 2014, was written by Judge Watford, and joined by Judges (Willie) Fletcher and (Milan) Smith. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Smith, 574 F.2d 882, 883 (CA6 1978) (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:37 pm
  Presumably people of two different genders, and a fictitious name deliberately so chosen by counsel for the plaintiff (since "John Doe" would have worked equally well). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
   That should not have been a fully satisfactory response to the Establishment Clause objection, because it fails to answer the question of why the government can lift burdens it has created for people with religious scruples but not for people with other sorts of scruples. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
This may come as a shock to Judge Keasler who concurred in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:41 am by Brian Cuban
I recently wrote a blog about why I did not think the United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Different people respond to reading, hearing or viewing the same content in different ways. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
  The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The statutory duty does not extend to every kind of activity that people engage in on the premises. [read post]