Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 701 - 720 of 3,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Smith largely repudiated the method of analysis used in prior free exercise cases like Wisconsin v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Does adultery affect my divorce case? [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
The wackiness of Watson is not the result but the reasoning:  Watson distinguishes rather than overrules Smith v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
As well as what we should expect.Beyond this larger point, I did want to make one other particularized critique of Judge Smith's view -- or, perhaps more accurately, of the FLSA (depending on whether or not you think that Judge Smith's done the right thing here, which I think most people would).Judge Smith's holding is based upon the intuition that since the nurses prefer this regime, and since it was done for their benefit, the FLSA time-and-a-half… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co., 15 AD2d 526, 526 [1961], affd 11 NY2d 1026 [1962]; compare Smith v New York Cent. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Hunter, "Towards Amalgamationist Governance: Governor Hutt and Contradictions in British Colonial Policy Regarding Aboriginal People in Western Australia"5. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
For example, there is a review of Perfecting the Constitution: The Case for Article V (Lexington Books) by Darren Patrick Guerra, and a review of Dean Smith's A Theory of Shield Laws: Journalists, Their Sources, and Popular Constitutionalism (LFBScholarly Publishing). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
, (Croatian Political Science Review (December, 2018)).Christopher Sundby & Suzanna Sherry, Term Limits and Turmoil: Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]