Search for: "People v. Smith (1981)"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Lorie Smith’s websites were pure speech. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
§ 1981 to force the university to speak through people not of its choosing—which could mean a faculty and student body that don't match the university's notions of diversity—could impede the university's ability to speak. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Young v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Ironically, the film’s original cut was destroyed in a fire just six weeks after its 1928 premiere and was thought lost to history until 1981, when someone discovered a print in a janitor’s closet at a Norwegian mental institution. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Wise Smith & Assocs. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Submissions are sought from a very wide range of people and institutions, including the catch-all “members of the public”. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
And there are the people who stop doing business with you. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
& Louisville Times, 623 S.W.2d 882 (Ky. 1981); Postill v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Joan Smith Lawrence was the first woman to serve as Supreme Court Commissioner. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
Complaint, Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
Smith (4th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
