Search for: "People v. Smith (1985)" Results 61 - 80 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
  An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm by Christopher Simon
This question was at the heart of a recent decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals, Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Barry Sookman
The decision by Justice Tremblay-Lamer in Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET 2016 FC 612 to grant the injunction was not surprising. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Soft Sheen Products, Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 725 (D.C. 1985); Wooderson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And in their 1985 book Citizenship Without Consent: Illegal Aliens in the American Polity, Peter Schuck and Rogers Smith relied on an 1884 Supreme Court case holding that Native Americans are not entitled to birthright citizenship to question the broad language of Wong Kim Ark as applied to children of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]