Search for: "People v. Smith (1985)"
Results 101 - 120
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 4:41 pm
Penal Code Ann. 19.03(a)(2) (Supp.1985). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Cleburne Living Center, 1985); and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals (Romer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article,The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1985); Williams v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:19 am
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
See Knick v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles.Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
