Search for: "People v. Smith (1985)" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Kimberlin, 781 F.2d 1247 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 938, 107 S.Ct. 419, 93 L.Ed.2d 370 (1986); United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article,The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
 Smith versus Inco has nothing to say to that. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am by Kenji Yoshino
Cleburne Living Center, 1985); and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals (Romer v. [read post]