Search for: "People v. Smith (1985)"
Results 141 - 160
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
It also matters quite a lot, of course, if those people are economically integrated and prosperous. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Here is the decision in Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Commonwealth, 230 Va. 208 (1985). 1. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Commonwealth, 230 Va. 208 (1985). 1. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
