Search for: "People v. Smith (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:22 am by Peter S. Vogel
Ultimately on July 14, 2016 the 2nd Circuit reversed the trial court and ruled in Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm by Nerds in Court
  In view of the Fourth Amendment protection against warrantless searches, this practice was challenged in the case of Smith v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm by Nerds in Court
  In view of the Fourth Amendment protection against warrantless searches, this practice was challenged in the case of Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Paul Smith
Paul Smith is the vice president of Litigation and Strategy at the Campaign Legal Center. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Board of Education, Roe, Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]