Search for: "People v. Smith (1993)" Results 1 - 20 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Jacobson (4th Cir. 1993) (recognizing the "concern that the jury's very knowledge that pseudonyms were being used" could "tend to validate" the plaintiff's claims); see also Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Jacobson (4th Cir. 1993) (recognizing the "concern that the jury's very knowledge that pseudonyms were being used" could "tend to validate" the plaintiff's claims); see also Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Jacobsen (4th Cir. 1993), for proceeding in a case pseudonymously. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Jacobsen (4th Cir. 1993), for proceeding in a case pseudonymously. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]