Search for: "People v. Snowden" Results 61 - 80 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm by Stewart Baker
Nate Jones and I examine the latest chapters in the now-encyclopedic tale of Silicon Valley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:21 am by Frank Pasquale
Snowden's put forward, all the stories that have been written, what you're not reading about is the government actually abusing these programs and, you know, listening in on people's phone calls or inappropriately reading people's e-mails. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights.  [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
PPD-28 stated forthrightly that the U.S. strove to respect the privacy rights of all people around the world. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm by Trevor Timm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maryland, to argue that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone records under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]