Search for: "People v. Spencer" Results 221 - 240 of 327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
Spencer So we were all very relieved when in a case in 2010 called Elias v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am by Daniel Martin
The chief investigator for the office, Spencer Mann, said Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Spencer (4th Dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction and vacated a Superior Court Information (SCI) where the defendant pled guilty pursuant to a SCI after he was indicted for a crime arising from the same incident. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Spencer (4th Dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction and vacated a Superior Court Information (SCI) where the defendant pled guilty pursuant to a SCI after he was indicted for a crime arising from the same incident. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Essentially, the problem here was that Marks & Spencer bought the word 'interflora' as a keyword for Google's AdWord paid referencing service, so that people who were looking for the world-famous Interflora flower delivery service would find an advertisement for Marks & Spencer's rival service at the top of the non-organic, paid-for search results. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]