Search for: "People v. Spencer" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am by David Fraser
Spencer decision from the Supreme Court to get access to this sort of information without judicial oversight. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Essentially, the problem here was that Marks & Spencer bought the word 'interflora' as a keyword for Google's AdWord paid referencing service, so that people who were looking for the world-famous Interflora flower delivery service would find an advertisement for Marks & Spencer's rival service at the top of the non-organic, paid-for search results. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Spencer Roane The losing party then appealed that ruling, and the case was once again before the Supreme Court, this time under the name Martin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Spencer Roane The losing party then appealed that ruling, and the case was once again before the Supreme Court, this time under the name Martin v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am by James Stewart
Going further, it is settled case law of the European Court of Justice (Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Case C-323/09; Google v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
Herbert Spencer's Social Statics" represented a complete rejection of the notion that the Constitution was somehow a libertarian document. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:53 am by jamison
His recent update on the Melendez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]