Search for: "People v. Spencer" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
It's on Netflix and under a license that allows for educational public screenings.Jim Jaffe: I like using a nice PBS documentary on the Scopes Monkey Trial – not as dramatic or fun as the film Inherit the Wind with Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow (!) [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:43 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
What made me smile this week I’ve joined the Man v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:18 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
It’s one of those cases that gets thrown up every couple of years that causes a bit of mild pandemonium, like Spencer v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am by John Floyd
The four people she named as her abusers were: Spencer, DeAnne, Karen and Matthew. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
” With these words in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:51 pm by Tessa Shepperson
 This is less of a problem now though, after the Spencer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:51 pm by Tessa Shepperson
 This is less of a problem now though after the Spencer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]