Search for: "People v. Spicer" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) Warby J held that an article’s headline, however defamatory, must be read in context, with the text of the article, in order to arrive at the natural and ordinary meaning. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:13 pm
  Spicer says that if that's indeed what the statute provides, it's unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 1 to 5 February 2021 (Julian Knowles… [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
ASA published its Annual Report 2020 which highlights steps taken to make sure young and vulnerable people are protected from misleading, harmful or irresponsible ads. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On 7 June 2019 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) (heard 5 June 2019). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
David Walliams and Martin Clunes have settled damages claims over phone hacking allegations  by receiving “substantial compensation” and a public apology, after bringing legal action against the publisher of The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and The People. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Currently the company does not allow people who are under this age to create an account on the platform. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child announced the formation of recommendations for children’s online protections based on responses from more than 700 young people ages 9 to 22 from 27 countries. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 3:58 am by SHG
The law recognizes the existence of the Fourth Estate in such decisions as New York Times v. [read post]