Search for: "People v. Stevens" Results 41 - 60 of 2,919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2007, 3:20 am
Jan Crawford Greenburg says people are wrong to focus on Justice Kennedy, despite his ability to tip the Court to one side or the other in tough cases. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Obama, appearing in the Rose Garden Friday afternoon after returning home from a trip to Prague, pledged to “move quickly” to name a successor who, he said, would possess qualities similar to those of Justice Stevens: “an independent mind, a record of excellence and integrity, a fierce dedication to the rule of law and a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of ordinary people. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
 In 1976, Potter Stewart,  Lewis Powell, and Stevens jointly authored the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:23 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens turns 87 today. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:29 pm
It sets out the minimum protections to which people are entitled. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
      The post What I Hope to Learn from Justice Stevens' Papers on Kelo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Liam Cronan, Boston University School of Law, is publishing 'Give Us Free': The Influences of Steven Spielberg’s Amistad on Legal Scholarship and the African Voices Behind United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm by Christine Corcos
Liam Cronan, Boston University School of Law, is publishing 'Give Us Free': The Influences of Steven Spielberg’s Amistad on Legal Scholarship and the African Voices Behind United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  We can identify the areas of the law that could change as a result of Justice Stevens’ departure. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
The outrage of thinking that Article V of the Constitution can be used! [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm by WIMS
Justice Stevens dissented and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm by WIMS
Justice Stevens dissented and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Brian Stull, Capital Punishment Project
" Justice Stevens wrote the court's opinion barring the death penalty for mentally retarded people as cruel and unusual punishment (link to Atkins v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:55 pm
The WSJ reports: "I had people at a bridge game stop me and ask, 'How could you have written that opinion? [read post]