Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 1 - 20
of 664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
In the lead paragraph, Stewart wrote: [The] problem-plagued $35 billion takeover of BCE Inc. will likely be delayed until the end of the year owing to the increasingly fractious negotiations between the company's private equity buyers and a syndicate of lenders who are pushing to lower the value of the buyout, according to people involved in the negotiations. [11] Stewart then went on to provide a more detailed discussion, which included references to confidential… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:51 pm
"I'm not sure that Justice Stewart needs to say both "needlessly and senselessly". [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
Pursuant to Justice Stewart’s directions, they became public with the retirement of the last Justice to have served with Justice Stewart. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Stewart v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:40 am
The Court overruled People v Stewart, 441 Mich 89 (1992), which held that the two prior felony-firearm convictions had to arise out of separate criminal incidents. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
"For whatever reason, they could not bring themselves to do what they were about to tell the American people that they had to do" seven years later in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm
It’s true that this quote is indeed what Justice Stewart is famous for, but people generally miss the follow-up to the quote: Nine years later Stewart joined the dissent in Miller v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
Stewart comments: This could turn out to be a harsh blow for companies like Lenovo that have so far escaped the spotlight trained on Huawei and ZTE. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:02 pm
It was named for the plaintiff in the 1993 case of Daubert v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:46 pm
In City of Dallas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
The two lawyers for Charles Stewart maintained that the sanctity of property was paramount and that it would be dangerous to free all the black people in England, who numbered at the time approximately 15,000. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
The two lawyers for Charles Stewart maintained that the sanctity of property was paramount and that it would be dangerous to free all the black people in England, who numbered at the time approximately 15,000. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:05 pm
Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon issued an opinion addressing the state's motion to dismiss in Lane v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:54 pm
In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 5:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Chattels real v. personal/ Aliens - Naturalization / Constitutional Law – Indian defined/ Criminal Law - Sentencing: Stewart et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:22 pm
In a recent Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision, Stewart v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:14 am
**Separately, from Chesney v. [read post]
