Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 1 - 20
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2022, 12:20 pm
The post WILLIAM STEWART v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Part of the lawyer's job therefore is to facilitate communications with people outside. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:59 am
A lot of people lost a lot of money, many of them ordinary people saving for their children's college or retirement or those already in retirement. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
In the lead paragraph, Stewart wrote: [The] problem-plagued $35 billion takeover of BCE Inc. will likely be delayed until the end of the year owing to the increasingly fractious negotiations between the company's private equity buyers and a syndicate of lenders who are pushing to lower the value of the buyout, according to people involved in the negotiations. [11] Stewart then went on to provide a more detailed discussion, which included references to confidential… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:51 pm
"I'm not sure that Justice Stewart needs to say both "needlessly and senselessly". [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
Pursuant to Justice Stewart’s directions, they became public with the retirement of the last Justice to have served with Justice Stewart. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Stewart v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 1:25 pm
After all, Bush v Gore in 2ooo really came down to who could vote in Briar county, Florida. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm
His motive was the classic one: money.For the first dozen or so pages of the opinion, Justice Stewart recites the facts of the case in exhaustive detail, but my overall reaction was: "Seriously? [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
"For whatever reason, they could not bring themselves to do what they were about to tell the American people that they had to do" seven years later in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:19 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
Stewart comments: This could turn out to be a harsh blow for companies like Lenovo that have so far escaped the spotlight trained on Huawei and ZTE. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm
It’s true that this quote is indeed what Justice Stewart is famous for, but people generally miss the follow-up to the quote: Nine years later Stewart joined the dissent in Miller v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:02 pm
It was named for the plaintiff in the 1993 case of Daubert v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
To avoid forfeiture of the bond, the bail company insists that the bond is "void" because it was for the wrong amount, citing a Court of Appeal case from 1919 that so holds (albeit arguably in dicta).Justice Stewart holds -- eminently sensibly, in my view -- that the bond isn't void. [read post]
