Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 21 - 40
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 10:02 pm
It was named for the plaintiff in the 1993 case of Daubert v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
To avoid forfeiture of the bond, the bail company insists that the bond is "void" because it was for the wrong amount, citing a Court of Appeal case from 1919 that so holds (albeit arguably in dicta).Justice Stewart holds -- eminently sensibly, in my view -- that the bond isn't void. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:50 am
Stewart filed last Thursday in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
The two lawyers for Charles Stewart maintained that the sanctity of property was paramount and that it would be dangerous to free all the black people in England, who numbered at the time approximately 15,000. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:46 pm
In City of Dallas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:54 pm
In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
Stewart, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 5:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Chattels real v. personal/ Aliens - Naturalization / Constitutional Law – Indian defined/ Criminal Law - Sentencing: Stewart et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Justice Stewart wrote a letter to the editor of the WSJ after Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:22 pm
In a recent Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision, Stewart v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:14 am
**Separately, from Chesney v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 11:21 pm
It’s M-I-H-A-L-O-V-I-C-H. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 4:16 pm
" As a public service, Cybertoonz has boiled the argument down even further: The post Cybertoonz explains Netchoice v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 12:38 pm
In a recent unreported title insurance case, Nadvornianski v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
That testimony -- plus the spent shell casings -- makes it seem pretty darn obvious that there was indeed a shooting.Justice Stewart is right when she says that the evidence wasn't entirely clear about whether there were six or seven shots fired, which in turn reflects whether the gun was a revolver (which only holds six rounds) or a semiautomatic (which expels casings like the ones recovered at the scene). [read post]
