Search for: "People v. Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
” This Strickland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
I don't think there is a realistic chance of overruling Mapp v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
April 2018 Strickland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
(Wait – why do people tune in?) [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
Instead, the defendant must show “prejudice” under a reading of Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
The panel included Patricia Hruby Powell and Shadra Strickland, the author and illustrator, respectively, of a new and illustrated young people’s book titled Loving vs. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm
Dyk explained that a 1984 decision, Strickland v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
” In Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Further, the court found that the Florida Supreme Court unreasonably applied Strickland in holding that the deficiency was not prejudicial. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
People, 871 P.2d 769, 772 (Colo. 1994) (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689); People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:40 am
This case, however, is not the one to make that rule given the Strickland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
But since it’s already been discussed by way smarter people, it’s a perfect candidate for (prescription strength) Relist Watch SelectTM, which begins right now. ============================================================ Returning Relists Sireci v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
Pursuant to the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
Pursuant to the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]