Search for: "People v. Strickland" Results 81 - 100 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:29 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court revisited the subject in 2007 in the Texas case of Scott Panetti; more on Panetti v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am by Andrew Delaney
The SCOV instead concludes that the second standard used by the PRC court, the Strickland standard, is applicable.The Strickland standard (from the SCOTUS decision in Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Exxon Corp., 746 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Tenn. 1988) (citing Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
The Bank of New York, defendants-appellees NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticePersonal Knowledge of Allegation of Suspended License Denies One Defendant Dismissal of Charges People v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:41 am
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Fails to Satisfy 'Strickland' Test; Motion to Vacate Plea, Sentence Denied People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm by Tung Yin
Justice Ginsburg's concurrence was much more mild: To prevail  under the  prejudice requirement of  Strickland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am by Jeff Gamso
Wainwright) and there's the right to have that counsel be at least minimally effective (Strickland v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the petitioner’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Melinda Rowe-Sullivan (NIU Law 2003) successfully argued a matter of first impression before the Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, concerning the rescue doctrine.Melinda represented the plaintiffs in Strickland v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by Lee Davis
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
This term he refused to join Justice Sotomayor's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]