Search for: "People v. Strickland" Results 121 - 140 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-361, the peculiar case that asks whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, or whether it’s enough to conspire with the people whose money they’re taking. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Padilla held that the defendant's claim was subject to the two-prong ineffective assistance of counsel test in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  He asks: Why are some juries and some judges so eager to convict and incarcerate people? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:49 am by Wendy McGuire Coats
He also confessed to two other people, and he ultimately pleaded no contest to murder. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by Lee Davis
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
(Wait – why do people tune in?) [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
  This term he refused to join Justice Sotomayor's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]