Search for: "People v. Strickland"
Results 121 - 140
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
United States, 14-361, the peculiar case that asks whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, or whether it’s enough to conspire with the people whose money they’re taking. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
See Jenkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm
Padilla held that the defendant's claim was subject to the two-prong ineffective assistance of counsel test in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am
He asks: Why are some juries and some judges so eager to convict and incarcerate people? [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:54 am
"*Act V has yet to be written. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:49 am
He also confessed to two other people, and he ultimately pleaded no contest to murder. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court recognized in Strickland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
I don't think there is a realistic chance of overruling Mapp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
(Wait – why do people tune in?) [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
This term he refused to join Justice Sotomayor's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:18 pm
” People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 3:00 am
Strickland v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:28 pm
Under Lafler v. [read post]