Search for: "People v. Stuart"
Results 1 - 20
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
I was delighted to have been asked to contribute to the International Scientific Conference ‘Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear’ taking place 9 November 2024, in Sofia Bulgaria (more on that event HERE). [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
It is the state and profundity of that emotion, perhaps more than the calculus of rational governance, that propels a people to statehood, and statehood to take its particular form. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 12:15 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am
This holding conflicts with a recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
[An attack on the independence of the federal judiciary.] [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
Part C will examine the existing legal scholarship on how constitutional law intersects with the rights of transgender people. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Stuart Harrow, a Defense Department employee, was furloughed because of budget shortfalls. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
The case is being heard today before Judges Carolyn Dineen King, Stuart Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. [read post]
