Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 101 - 120 of 972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:21 am
(lcegs1) (Entered: 02/20/2009)Adolph v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
Sullivan as deeply inconsistent with the original understanding of the First Amendment? [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
"In an ideal world, this would run its course, the people who have done something wrong would be punished, and the firm would take steps to change the environment. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Another preview comes from Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan at Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
  Colonel Sullivan is of the opinion that there may be several fruitful avenues for rebuttal in this case. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Sullivan, 625 F.2d at 12. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Discovery Radiology Physicians, P.C.; Allstate Insurance Company, The People ex rel. v. [read post]