Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court's opinion yesterday in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Superior Court (People), No. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:47 pm
The trial court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge Ernest M. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
Give him the car and let the civil courts decide who actually owns it.In the old days, any fight about a million-dollar car would likely have taken place in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Superior Court (People), No. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), no. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Code § 3370.1 (stats. 1972, ch. 1084, p. 2021), cited in People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:27 pm
I was surprised to see a case today captioned "People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court Argument - 9:00 AM on April 8, 2009. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:56 pm
On December 17, 2010, in Duran v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
This year the trial is People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
After the Court granted review of the case, the Legislature quickly passed a new statute that made it clear that the People should win. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Maas v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
[People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court (ARCO), no. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:38 am
Superior Court — despite... [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:03 pm
So sayeth the California Court of Appeal, which reverses the dismissal of an indictment. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:53 am
We thus "may presume that the matter was properly before that court" (People v Chad S., 237 AD2d 986, lv denied 90 NY2d 856; see People v Hurd, 12 AD3d 1198, 1199, lv denied 4 NY3d 764).But in both People v Chad S. (237 AD2d 986) and People v Hurd (12 A.D.3d 1198) the Court had found that "the record fails to establish that defendant did not waive a preliminary hearing, that a hearing was not… [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
Respondent court found the campaign to prevent Judge Goethals from hearing long cause murder trials substantially interfered with the court’s ability to administer criminal justice in Orange County, and thereby violated the separation of powers doctrine. [read post]
